Hotel Rwanda †The Rwandan Genocide Essay

Hotel Rwanda is a contract about the genocide that transpired within the premises of the city of Kigali, the heart of Rwanda during the year 1994. This evil act lasted for 100 days killing thousands of innocent lives of Rwandan men, women and children. only when in the film, it did not focus on the genocide. Instead, it shed a wanton on the heroic and courageous deed of cardinal ordinary mankind in an effort to save the lives of some of his countrymen.In the movie, almost all(a) of the aspects of the genocide were tackled including the powerlessness of the United Nations to put a stop to the groundless killings perpetrated by the Rwandan g overnment and the Hutu rebels against the Tutsis. This was very much evident when the character of Dan Cheadle was promised by the UN Colonel that he, his family and all the refugees at the Milles Collines will be rescued. But when the colonel had a communion with another UN officer, the plan seemed to conduct changed.The colonel explained that only foreign nationals were allowed to leave Rwanda. scarce a small number of troops were instructed to uphold peacekeeping and not peacemaking meaning they were not allowed to shoot at anyone even if they commit fiery actions. More so, the minimal involvement of the international organizations and their eventual negligence over the escalating killings in Rwanda played a pivotal role in the change magnitude deaths of thousands of people.Instead of suspensoring the Tutsis to take refuge to a safer place in neighboring countries, these organizations decided not to get involve because of the misconception that nothing merchant ship restore the peace and order in an anarchic setting. Moreover in the movie, a Red Cross worker drew some tutelage because of how she showed her bravery by setting aside her fears and her own welf are safe to save a few people from being mercilessly killed by the Hutus. Some aid workers decided to stay in order to help while others chose to flee i n order to protect their welfare.Overall, the movie generated an accurate depiction of the Rwandan genocide. However, some controversial issues were downplayed like the role of the French in the uprising and arming of the Hutu rebels. After the genocide, some reports have surfaced that implicated a few French politicians and the French military with this tragic incident. According to the results of the findings of an self-supporting Rwandan Commission, the French government was aware of preparations for the genocide and helped train the ethnic Hutu reserves perpetrators. The report included that France provided the Hutus with political, military, diplomatic and logistical support. For almost 2 years, the boot had ga at that placed data and interviewed several survivors. All the information that had been obtained, served as testimonies to the participation of the French government in the killing of almost 800,000 civilians in the cover of 100 days (BBC, 2008). But the French ve hemently refuted the accusations.In their defense, they utter that the allegations were biased because the commission has only one thing in take heed and that is to prove that the French are guilty. The French Foreign Ministry said there is no surprise in the conclusions of the commission given its mission (CNN, 2008). deviation from this, the film also failed to include the admission of the United Nations of its failure to hold on the genocide. But for the UN, this became a learning experience. They realized that people should not be neglected specifically in times of dire need when lives are at stake (BBC, 2000).Given this new angle in the Rwandan genocide, it should have been also portrayed in the movie. This would have given viewers more than accurate representation of what really happened in Rwanda in April 1994. Also, this would have been a chance for the whole world to determine who the real culprits were in one of the worst humanitarian crisis of the 20th century. More so, these events could have provided a universal outlook on how humans are capable of doing horrendous and unappeasable acts just to have power and control.